2018: Pass through deduction for non-service businesses.

Ref: HR 1 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Assumption: You receive income from your sole proprietorship, S corporation, LLC , partnership or other pass through entity.  Also, that entity is NOT a service business.  Example: Retail, manufacturing or leasing personal property.

Simple example:  Net income from the business is $350,000 and the business paid total W2 wages of $100,000.  Assuming no equipment placed in service in the year, the deduction would be the lesser of 20% of $350k ($70k) OR 50% of wages of $100k = $50k.  The pass through deduction is $50k.

This deduction is taken on page 2 of the Form 1040 when determining taxable income.  It is NOT taken into account in dertmining Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) on page 1 of the return.

This is a simple example.  Your pass through deduction should be calculated specifically to your tax situation.

2018:No unreimbursed employee deductions.

Ref: HR 1, “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”

NOW is the time to negotiate with your employer for 2018.  If you are an employee tasked with paying many unreimbursed costs for your employer, work with the company to set up a qualified reimbursement plan.

GONE ARE:

  1. MILEAGE DEDUCTION
  2. BUSINESS MEALS DEDUCTION (i.e., entertaining customers)
  3. TRAVEL EXPENSE DEDUCTION INCLUDING PER-DIEM
  4. EMPLOYEE HOME OFFICE DEDUCTION
  5. ALL OTHER UNREIMBURSED DEDUCTIONS

Nearly all of these can be reimbursed by your employer.  If so, the employer gets a deduction and you DON’T have reportable income.  (Big exception… even the employer doesn’t get a business meals / entertainment deduction in 2018).

SELF EMPLOYED:  The above DOESN’T apply to self employed.  This change only applies to W2 employees who in 2017 and before took an itemized deduction for unreimbursed employee expenses. For self-employed, see our post dateed Jan 24, 2018.

2017 Tax Bill: Property tax prepay … and what is allowed?

Reference: HR 1, “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.”

There’s a LOT of contradictory media articles on the subject of prepayment of California property taxes due April 2018.  Here’s an excerpt from Parkers Tax Bulletin:

Caution: The Conference Bill includes a provision blocking taxpayers from prepaying state and local income tax relating to the 2018 tax year in 2017 in order to circumvent the new limitation on the deduction. Specifically, the bill provides that, in the case of an amount paid in a tax year beginning before January 1, 2018, with respect to a state or local income tax imposed for a tax year beginning after December 31, 2017, the payment will be treated as paid on the last day of the tax year for which such tax is imposed for purposes of applying the provision limiting the dollar amount of the deduction.

Our analysis: As CA starts its fiscal year 7/1/17, the taxes payable in April are for a tax year beginning before 12/31/17 and should be ok.

So… in PLAIN LANGUAGE:  You CAN pay your 2nd installment of your 2017 property taxes (due by April 2018) before 12/31/2017 (postmark) and deduct in 2017 UNLESS you are subject to Alternative Minimum Tax in 2017.  You CANNOT pay your December 2018 (first) installment of your 2018 property taxes early.  The CA counties won’t take the payment and the IRS won’t let you deduct it.

Problem solved!

Attorneys fees for alimony (non-deductible)

Ref: Barry v. Comm’r, TC Memo 2017-237

Summary: Taxpayer hired an attorney to reclaim alimony that he felt was overpaid.  He argued the legal fees were deductible under Sec 212(1) because the result would be taxable income.

Tax court: Not deductible: Under the “origin of claim” doctrine, the transaction started under family law and not under a profit seeking venture.  The Tax Court also referenced earlier decisions where it disallowed legal payments incurred for alimony adjustment and for alimony recovery in prior cases. Lastly, the Court argued that had Barry brought this claim in the year of the divorce, the legal fees would have been clearly nondeductible as part of the divorce proceedings (a personal expense).

New per-diem rates for Continental US business travel (CONUS)

Reference: IRS Notice 2017-54

The rate for meals and incidentals (M&IE) has been raised to $68 for high cost localities under the IRS high/low method.  Like all business meals, the net deduction is one half of that amount.

Example: Sole proprietor is on a six day business trip. M&IE under CONUS is $68 * 6 * 1/2 = $204 as the net deduction on the tax return.  M&IE is in lieu of actual expenses for meals, tips and other incidental travel charges.

New beneficial CA Medi-Cal estate recovery rules.

Source: SB 833; Welfare and Institutions Code Sec 14009.5

Effective for Medi-Cal recipients who die on or after January 1, 2017: Medi-Cal can now only make a recovery claim against estate assets subject to probate that were owned by the decedent at the time of death.  (Before this change, all assets owned at death were subject to estate recovery claims).

Short summary:  If the Medi-Cal recipient has placed his/her residence in a revocable trust (e.g., a “living trust”), it is not an asset which will be subject to probate and Medi-Cal won’t be able to make a recovery claim against it.

There are other details in this process. Please contact us if you would like a referral to an estate/trust attorney who can give you professional guidance in your particular situation.

Sale of Residence to Parents: Part Sale/Gift

Fiscalini v. Commissioner, TC Memo 2017-163

In summary, a taxpayer sold his residence to his parents for a sales price of $975,000.  He received no cash directly.  The parents paid off his mortgages with a total of $664,000.

The Tax Court determined that the mortgage relief was the effective sales price of $664,000. Minus basis and the $250,000 Section 121 exclusion for sale of a residence resulted in gain of $122,000.

The remaining equity of $311,000 ($975k – 664k) was deemed to be a gift from the taxpayer to his parents.

Extreme penalties on late pass-through partnerships and S corporations.

Source: CA R&TC Sec 19172, 19172.5 and like IRC.

Significant penalties apply to pass-through entities which miss their extended filing deadline of September 15, 2017.  After that point, the extension is not valid.  The penalty for a partnership with two partners filing on November 15, 2017 would be:

Federal: 8 months * $195/partner* 2 partners = $3,120

California: 8 months * $18 * 2 partners = $288

Total late filing penalties based on number of partners = $3,408.

DON’T MISS THE EXTENDED DUE DATE OF SEPTEMBER 15! (Be sure we have your partnership or corporate information no later than September 1, 2017 for the 2016 tax year).

PEO (Professional Employer Organization) and payroll tax liability.

Reference: Chief Counsel Advice 201724025

An S corporation used a PEO to “lease” its employees with the contracted understanding that the PEO would remit all payroll taxes to the IRS.  The PEO failed to pay those taxes and the IRS concluded that they were still the liability of the S corporation employer in spite of its contract with the PEO.

The CCA did point out that IF the PEO goes through the process of being certified by the IRS, becoming a CPEO, then the S corporation would NOT have been held responsible for the CPEO’s failure to remit the taxes to the IRS.

Take away: If you’re using a PEO for “employee leasing,” be sure that they have gone through the process of being certified with the IRS and are a CPEO.